Cambelts have come into sharp focus this year as have three vehicles which 'should' need them.
First the TF. Replaced at 18, 600 miles as part of a mis-diagnosed HGF (long story) and now showing only 31, 000. Mileage is obviously
not relevant, but that last change was in 2014, so the réceived wisdom is that it should be replaced on age alone.
However I also have a 15 year old Suzuki Vitara with 86,000 on the clock which we now discover missed its cambelt change(s) and is still on its original, and a friend who has an Audi TT with an at least eight year old belt because he didn't realise there was also an age consideration. Our previous Ducato motor home had a recommended mileage change somewhere around 100,000 as I recall and must have been approaching 10 years old when we sold it. (Our current Ducato recommends 5 years - which is this year!)
So, OK, play safe and so on, but has anyone actually experienced a belt failure attributable to age alone?
What's that black canvas thing behind the seats for?