After some disscusion on .org the John and David C rightly commented that the TF's were all the same length, the retailer was pointed in the direction of the thread and all 3 of us had the same length brake hoses sent with no fuss.
Today I visited Jon Norris and he replaced the brake lines with copper ones, fitted the ss brake hoses, which were correct and changed the gear box all. All good. At the weekend I tightened the gear stick, follow a smashing how to on here, and with the new oil feels a great deal better. The rear ss hoses have a little kink in them.
Big thanks to Jon, great job. and to Jon's mam, smashing lady. It took me the 2 hours drive home to warm up. My knees were knocking more than the rear view mirror.
I have a query what is the reason for the the difference in sizes between the F and the TF the reason Im asking is my F has Tf sub frames so am I right in thinking I would need TF brake hoses ?
Originally Posted by
I was looking at these too. The same ones are on ebay (same price) but which would I order? I have a Mk1 F with 2003 TF APs. Whats the difference between the F & TF ones, they have a diferent product number
the front brake pipes are longer for the f than the tf as they connect to the brakeline at the battery tray. the tf connects near to the bottom of the shock absorber
Did you have any problems with the brake line unions? I have mine to fit on the list of weekend jobs and want to be sure I have all the bits I might need!
Its a relatively easy job as long as nothing goes wrong. Main issue is probably getting the hose off the brake line without damaging it. A proper spanner will help.