Now I’ve no idea as to what the chemical composition of the coolant in question is, but if it has a lower rate of thermal expansion in the important temperature range, then it stands to reason that the cooling system would be running at a lower pressure within the desired temperature range.
How much? I couldn’t say, but if this stuff doesn’t boil till 180C then I’d imagine that the difference could be considerable.
And it would also depend upon the nucleate boiling behaviour, that is the tiny layer of steam that forms between the liquid coolant and the surface to be cooled, the steam acts as an insulator reducing the effectiveness of the thermal conductivity of the coolant.
And furthermore I also would need to consider any difference in the thermal conductivity of the two coolants.
Now if this stuff does a pretty good Houdini impersonation and tries to escape the confines of the cooling system…… and normal coolant additive already does a good job of that, then the need to “ tighten “ all the hose clamps to compensate, may not be required as this could possibly be offset by the lower operating pressure.
Another question is how corrosive is this stuff? How do gaskets, pump seals, hoses, and the various metals, plastics etc that are used in our cars, react to exposure to this stuff, over time?
Normal coolant additives can, in some circumstances be more corrosive than plain water, usually when used in to low a concentration, or old and buggered.
These are the important facts to consider when evaluating the worth of this product, if it doesn’t achieve these goals then it’s just another miracle elixir, and as a such it will no doubt also lay claim to fixing such ailments as coughs, colds, sore holes, crook sheep and Fergy tractors that won’t start,
So if it actually does what it says on the tin….. all well and good ( mind you, it’s also worth considering how carefully worded the label on the tin is……. Bloody lawyers and their damned weasel words. )